Grand National on the long road to oblivion?

The previous post has generated considerable debate on The Racing Forum. A sizable number of experienced people seem to be against the race; they’d like to see it consigned to history.

I like the National though cannot deny some ambivalence when watching. From a selfish viewpoint I find it a very profitable betting race. From a historic perspective, I think its loss would be mourned by many Brits – racing and non-racing fans: the older we get the more we want to see the old reliable events click round again in our life ‘calendar’.

It’s worth stressing again the key point in my initial post – whatever anyone else thinks, it looks like Aintree have unwittingly steered the race onto a path which will result in its natural demise.

The factors which have played a substantial part in reducing the field size this year are irreversible. The only significant aspect which can be reversed (and almost certainly will be imo) is the special treatment, by the handicapper, of quality horses.

From 2013 the race will be worth £1m plus. That will be hugely tempting for owners of Gold Cup class horses, especially when they’re safe in the knowledge that they will be better off in the National than in a level weights Grade 1.

If you had a horse 5lbs to 7lbs below Gold Cup class, wouldn’t you be tempted to miss Cheltenham for Aintree and go there with a fresh well-treated horse for twice the winner’s prize money?

I would.

Would you pay £5k to run your 140/150 rated horse in the National knowing that the class horses will get big favours from the handicapper?

I wouldn’t.

Aintree has unwittingly charted a course that will probably reduce the Gold Cup field to single figures and its own turnout for the National to sub-20. I’m convinced that from a spectacle viewpoint alone, fewer than 20 runners would seriously affect the public’s interest in the race.

By an unhappy accident for Aintree (a happy one for GN opponents), the race looks set for a lingering death by misadventure.

2 thoughts on “Grand National on the long road to oblivion?

  1. Hopefully this will not come to pass but I can definitely see that some little acorns have been sown this year and we all know what happens to little acorns don’t we?
    I don’t think anyone in racing has a backbone any more to stand up and say “Enough is enough”. Someone/or a collective needs to take a step back and think if we carry on charting this course we won’t have any NH racing left in 20yrs time.

  2. Impossible (from my viewpoint) to argue with any of your comments Joe and your foresight is much needed in the ‘corridors of power’ though of course, you are far too honest to get beyond first base.

    I guess the old adage is true that around two thirds of thoroughbreds never win a race and even if they do, the prize money might not be worth 25% of the £5K you talk of to enter a horse in the big race soon.

    The batteries in my abacus must have ‘run out’ because the figures relating to so many aspects of our great sport fail to add up any more…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.